Monday, 28 March 2011

Essay: Introducing Sustainability and Sustainable Graphic Design.




Today the concept of sustainable design has become increasingly significant in our modern society. We live in a time where consumerism is a prominent feature in our everyday life and designers are one the biggest contributors to the tradition of over consumption. However, there has been a growing realization that the principles that we have based our way of life on since the industrial revolution is in fact are destructive and unsustainable.
“ The remarkable achievements of the celebrated Industrial Revolution are now beginning seriously to be questioned principally because the environment was not considered at the time. It was felt that the sky was so vast and clear nothing could ever change its colour…Toda we should know better”(Brundtland, 1984, p.45)
More and more designers are changing the way they think and becoming innovators in developing ways in which we can consume more sustainably. We are developing without considering the earth’s capability to provide and the only way that we can ensure we will be able to satisfy our basic needs in the future without destroying the earth along the way is to change the way we think, rethink the way me make things and make things sustainably. In this essay I am going to discuss what it is to be sustainable and why we should become sustainable. I will also introduce the role of Graphic Designers in changing the way we make things and what the ‘Cradle to Cradle’ model is and how it can be applied to a number of design practices in order for them to being sustainable
“Sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of the future generation to meet their own needs”(p.54). In 1984, the WCED (The World Commission n Environment), lead by Prime Minister of Norway Gro Harlem Brundtland, issued a report, ‘Our Common Future’ on sustainable development. The report, also known as the Brundtland report, was ‘a global agenda for change’(p.11). It was created to ‘ define shared perceptions of long-term environmental issues and the appropriate efforts needed to deal successfully with the problems of protecting and enhancing the environment”(p.11). The report defined a number of factors affecting our current situation such as poverty and the economic crisis. However, the report was written over twenty years ago and in this essay the main issues to be discussed are our over consuming behaviour and the overestimation into the limitations of earths resources in relations to the way we are living and these relate directly to design. We are consuming at the rate in which the earth cannot keep up with. ‘the simple truth is that all of our major environmental concerns are either caused by or contribute to, the ever-increasing consumption of goods and services’ (McDonough and Braungart, 2002, p. 50) As mentioned, the environment was never a part of the consideration when the Industrial Revolution took place. Therefore the way we make everything today is based on the belief that we have unlimited supply of natural resource, which is untrue. Therefore in order to become sustainable, we need to rethink the way me make everything. One group of people who can help contribute to this change are designers and they can do that so by following the pioneering model into rethinking the way we make things, the ‘Cradle to Cradle’ theory.

Graphic design is everywhere; throughout our daily lives we are surrounded by design. Everything we see today has been designed by someone. Everything we buy has been packaged or advertised to make us feel the need to by them. Designers take a perfectly average product and package it so that this product, no different from any other, stands out from the rest. Everything is fighting to stand out, to be noticed, and to be bought. “Advertising design, in persuading people to buy things they don’t need, with money then don’t have in order to impress others who don’t care, (it) is probably the phoniest field (of profession) in existence today.”(Papanek, 1985, p.ix). Seventy five percent of the communication pieces we design today end up in the trash with in a year. As graphic designers, we help large cooperates use up earth’s resources and turn them into profit. We also help create unnecessary waste, waste that can be prevented. However, designers are problem solvers and we can help minimize and even turn this demolition of our planet into something positive, if we choose to.
“His (a designer’s) social and moral judgment must be brought into play long before he begins to design, since he has to make a judgment...as to whether a product he is asked to design or redesign merit his attention at all. In other words, will his design be on the side of the social good or not.”(Papanek, 1985, p.55)
So, why design anything at all? The more sustainability is considered the closer we come to the conclusion to not buy and to not consume. However, ‘Consumption is both a natural integral facet of human behaviour’(Chapman and Gant, p.6). We cannot ask people to stop consuming, to stop being human. What we can do, as graphic designers, is to redirect their behavior and ‘design for sustainable consumption’(p.6). What we need is a kind of ‘sustainable design that signifies creation, progression and development, and presents the real opportunities for visionaries and heroes to emerge.’(p.4). In ‘ Cradle to Cradle’, William McDonough and Michael Braungart , have done just that.
There are many things Graphic designers can do to become ‘less bad’. We can recycle, use soy based ink, buy only FSC( Forestry Stewardship Council) certified paper. But to fully become ‘good’ we need to change the way that we make things. Particularly since the Industrial Revolution, the principles that we have based our industry on is the ‘Cradle to Grave’ model. “ Resources are extracted, shaped into products, sold and eventually disposed of in a ‘grave’ of some kind, usually a landfill or incinerator.’(McDonough and Braungart, 2002, p.27). We are the consumers but we actually ‘consume’ very little of what has been used to make the product. We eat the food, use the product for a certain amount of time, everything else goes straight to the ‘grave’. The packaging, the energy used to produce the good, the raw materials and etc. William McDonough and Michael Braungart have introduced a new way of making things. ‘Cradle to Cradle’ is a new paradigm of human and natural activity. Instead of a product going to its grave after its life cycle has ended, it is ‘reincarnated’, in fact, the life cycle doesn’t end at all. The ‘Cradle to Cradle’ design proposes that all design can learn from nature to become effective, progressive and sustainable. The model is based on three fundamental principles. The first one is the concept that waste equals food. In nature nothing is wasted, every single organism is a part of a cycle. One organism’s waste is food to another. For example, “ A cherry tree makes many blossons and fruit to germinate and grow. That is why the tree blossons. But the extra blossoms are far from useless. They fall to the ground, decompose, feed various organisms and microorganisms, and enrich the soil.” (p.92). This principle needs to be considered right at the beginning of the design process of everything we make. Instead of only focusing on the product getting to the end user, we must consider what happens after it has reached the consumer. The second principle is We, as designers need to recongnise that materials can be designed as nutrients that flow through a metabolism whether that would be a natural or a designed one. The second principle is to celebrate diversity. Nature thrives on diversity and healthy ecosystems are complex communities of living things. Each organism has different responsibilities to its surroundings working alongside other organisms sustaining a healthy system. “ The vitality of ecosystems depends on relationships: what goes on between species, their uses and exchanges of materials and energy in a given place.” (p.121). So, if nature is our model, how does the industry fit into it? They are “Industries that respect diversity engage with local material and energy flows, and with local social, cultural and economic forces, instead of viewing themselves as autonomous entities, unconnected.”(p.122) The last principle is to use current solar income. Every living thing flourishes under the energy from the sun. It is vast, powerful and necessary. The Cradle-to-Cradle system taps into current solar income using direct solar energy. More and more technological advances on collecting solar energy are emerging and it is becoming easier to access solar power in the energy marketplace. It is difficult to apply all three principles to Graphic Design specifically. However, it is still possible to create work that is based on the cradle-to-cradle model. You can design a packaging or a communication piece with a consideration for longevity and the life cycle. The process of manufacturing, from getting the raw materials to printing to delivery can be taken into account and the best result for the clients and achieving sustainability can be gained if the designer works along side the people involved in such process. The energy source, however, is perhaps the more difficult principle to follow as we, Graphic designers do not determine where our manufacturers or transporters get their energy from. But over, if Graphic designers take all of these principles into account before they even start designing anything. They are not being ‘less bad’ they are being sustainable.




The picture above is a piece of packaging design by Steve Haslip. This is an example of an eco Graphic Design piece which demonstrates that designers are problem solvers and how this and the cradle to cradle model are linked. “The concept was fairly simple: I buy t-shirts online and they always come wrinkled and I always run out of coat-hangers. So I designed a sustainable, reusable way to send and keep your t-shirts. As you open the package you create a coat hanger. The packaging could be made from recycled material whether it is card or plastic”(Haslip). The packaging won first prize in the D&AD student’s awards in 2007. This piece of packaging design is not directly based on the Cradle-to-Cradle model but it fits very satisfactorily under the principle. The simple and effective design ensures the longevity of the product’s life cycle. The packaging, which would normally be thrown away straight after the product is bought, is instead transformed into a hanger. The packaging becomes the storage equipment. Nothing is wasted but becomes something with a new purpose. This can be related back to the idea of waste equals food. The packaging is made form recycled material, which is the first go to rule when designing for sustainability. There are still two other Cradle to Cradle principles to be considered. There are always other factors effecting the design process and not just the designers principles and aspiration to created a fully sustainable product. How does one control where the energy used for the production process comes from? Your position as a designer and the to control every individual involved in this process. The more you look into the Cradle to Cradle model and this piece of design, it is being less bad, but how good is it. Perhaps there are a limitation of how much of this principle you can apply to everyday design depending factors beyond your control.

To conclude, as graphic designers, we are problem solvers and our problem is that the only way we know how to make things is the wrong way. We have based our industry and our way of life on the cradle to grave model which, joined by our over consumerism culture is using up earth’s limited resources. Designers are branded as a catalyst for such process, we encourage people to buy things they don’t need with the money they don’t have. Therefore, instead of being part of the problem, we can use our creativity to solve it. As Papanek rightly put, “ design must become an innovative, highly creative, cross-disciplinary tool responsive to the true needs of men. It must be more research oriented, and we must stop defiling the earth itself with poorly designed objects and structure”.(Papanek,1985, p.X). Sustainability is the answer and William Mcdonough and Michael Braungart have introduced us to a solution of becoming sustainable. The Cradle-to-Cradle model, which is based on the mechanisms in which every living organism in nature use. The model proposes that we can learn from nature and transform design into some progressive, sustainable and good.

Wednesday, 23 March 2011

Portfolio Task 6- Theory Into Practice


I have chosen Gary's post about stereotyping in design, more specifically, stereotyping in typography from different cultures.

This is what he says

'This simplification suggests that we are made ‘dumb’ therefore docile in the face of difference.
More important than that is a deeper issue related to ‘difference’ and that is that by being singled out as different, it is presumed that we ‘know’ what the norm or standard is. This knowledge is in fact the hidden Panopticon. '

So as a designer have you ever used a stereotype to initiate communication? For instance an idea of youth as opposed to age or what it is to be female as opposed to male? Have you tried to communicate to an audience based on class stereotypes? Have you seen other designers doing this?"


I have chosen a logo that I created for the YCN competition. The brief was to create a brand new identity for Marks and Spencer's Plan A. This is their campaign for the company to become greener and they set themselves 100 goals to achieve within 3 years that will improve their negative impact on the environment. Now Marks and Spencer wants to get the customers to get more involved with Plan A. The company had done their bit and now they want to get the customers to engage. So the brief was basically to create a new logo and use that new logo to promote Plan A.

This is the logo that I designed for Plan A. and I have chosen this as even though the resolution to the problem and the design were appropriate to the brief and what Marks and Spencer was looking for. I thin that this could definitely be seen as a stereo typical 'green' logo. The clean sans serif typeface, the simple shape , particularly round ( representing planet earth or some sort of metaphor to sustainability ), the leafy shapes.' And not to forget, the 'green' colour, that's always a give away. I created this Plan A , obviously, based on the fact that this is a call for cumtomers to get involved with this environmental campaign. I also based the design on the letter 'A' of plan A. but most of the design directions were influenced by the fact that this logo needs to say ' we love the environment.'

Here are some examples of other stereotypical green logos





This is pretty much the ultimate stereotypical logo for a green product or green company. TheHowever, I also think that eventhough it is a 'stereotype' it is also effective. How else would you be able to create a logo for a company that wants to be seen as 'green' or ecological. It is unavoidable. Most people who sees a logo that is green, has leaves on it will immediately associate that logo to something 'green' and surely thats the response that one will want when designing this kinda of logo. Every designer wants to be individual and to stand out but ultimately, our job is to communicate effective the message we want people to hear. If the message is ' hey look, I'm a really green company who cares about the environment' ( even if you're not ), you use imagery and typography that will get that response. We can do everything else to stand out and be individual, like , which sans serif typeface? which shade of green? etc. and thats what makes Graphic designer problem solvers.

How do you communicate the message effectively to our target audience but still stand out as an individual?

Portfolio Task 5- Sustainability & Capitalism

Sustainability has been defined by the Brundtland Commission's 'Our Common Future' as a ' development that meets the need of the present without compromising the ability of the futrue generations to meet their own needs'. This means that sustainability is an inter and intra-generational equity in the social, environmental, economic and moral and political spheres of society.


The main characteristics of capitalism are businesses creating new markets to stop themselves from dying. In order to stay afloat they must find a new market and the need for a new product or service. Another characteristic of capitalism is subsuming non-capital markets and therefore strengthening their own. It is not a linear system where they just subsume one singular item but its a 'diverse web that is continuously expanding and trapping things'.

'A crisis of Capitalism' is when capialization reaches the point where it can not expand itself any further both in terms of the product/ services and the financial expansion. This this when the cycle needs to be renewed and reinvented. In order to carry on they find a niche market in order to create a new 'web'. An example of this would be the environmental crisis. This has been used up to open a huge market of 'green' products and services. There are so many possibilities and opportunities for small and large businesses ( also owned buy these huge cooperate investors). These businesses also are not necessarily 'green' but still advertise themselves as green. This is called green washing.

There are different approaches to the problem of sustainability. The first on the the capitalist approach which still involves people buying and spending and therefore still keeping capitalism a float. This method of solving the environmental crisis is to encourage people to buy greener products , for example, the creation of the bio-diesel market and encouraging people to buy a NEW hybrid car. The second approach is ecologism which is the idea that in order to solve this environmental crisis we must stop capitalism entirely.

The concept of sustainability does not seem to be compatible with capitalism due to the need for capitalist to still sell a lot of products and services in order to stay afloat and even when they run out. There will always be another way , another niche market for them to dig their way into. Capitalism's approach to sustainability is not so much a way to solve the environmental crisis but more of a way to solve the capitalism crisis through sustainability.' Most things are not designed for the needs of the people or the plant but for the need of the manufacture to sell to people' ( Papnek. V, 1983, p46)

Portfolio Task 4- Communication Theory






The Shannon and weaver communication theory was aprt of a military experiment to develop a perfect model of communication and to allow you to analyze ways in which people communicate. Shannon-weaver said that the model can also be applied to a wide range of communication.

The task is to apply the Shannon and Weaver's communication theory model to this piece of advertisement for Australia post.

The information source would be the creative minds who came up with the concept. This could be the a single designer or a copy writer. In this case, the message is that if you really want to touch someone, you send them a letter. and because this is an advertisement for Australia post. The viewers should associate this idea of sending someone a letter to Australia post. The possible promblem at this stage is the information itself and the effectiveness of the idea. This is a level c communication problem, which is the effectiveness problem. The transmitter would be the designer, or creative director in charged of the art work. This includes the photography, typogrpahy, imagery, layout and other visual decisions. There is also the risk of noise here which depends on the quality of the artwork and how well it demonstrates the idea ( information source) . The problem could also be technical problems with the programmes used to create this artwork. The chanel is the media in which this advertisement has been created for and this would be printed poster. There is a small chance of redundancy here as there is a high likelihood of noise happening. This entirely depends on the location of the poster and how well its located in comparison to the targeted receiver. However, with a poster, the information can be made more redundant the information can be reduced as much as needed. The receiver is the target audience which is quite difficult to reduce as the amount of people who are capable to writing letters is quite vast. The destination how the message is being interpreted, if there hasn't been too much noise between all the different stages. the message should be interpreted correctly

A piece of chocolate....

This is an extra task to support my 'employment of appropriate critical methodologies a piece of design'





This is a piece of 'green' Graphic design by celery design. The packaging really demonstrates an attempt to make design more sustainable. 'It’s a no-holds-barred eco solution; 100% recycled paperboard box, compostable inner biopolymer bag, no glue, efficient on the press sheet, and it’s reversible for reuse as a gift box'. This is in fact an excellent example of the Cradle-to-Cradle principles are. The design follows the basic practice of green graphic design. The packaging is made out of a 100% recycled paperboard and reusable which in a way follows the ' waste equals food' principle. To eliminate the concept of waste means to design things--products, packaging, and systems--from the very beginning on the understanding that waste does not exist." ( McDonough and Braungart, 2002, p.27). The material that had been used in other products, or goods had not been sent straight to the incinerator or a landfill but instead, it had been recycled into this paper used in this packaging. However, the flaw is that extra energy and material are needed in the process of recycling. The pre recycled paper may have had other chemicals in them and was not intended to be recycled which results in more energy to rid of that chemical or causes the recycle paper's quality to worsen and still has a negative impact enviorment due to the released chemicals into the atmosphere. "By creating whole species of permanent garbage to clutter up the landscape, and by choosing materials and processes that pollute the air we breath, designers have become a dangerous breed"( Papanek, p. I.X).However, this lack of consideration is not something new. We create paper with the expectations of it being recycled but many a times, manufacturers do not consider the chemicals that will be released from the paper due the process of recycling and a lot of paper pulp are bleached in order for us to have a nice bright white paper for our internet print outs which end up in the bin within a day anyway. This lack of hindsight, could be due to the way in which our industrial world as developed " The remarkable achievements of the celebrated Industrial Revolution are now beginning seriously to be questioned principally because the environment was not considered at the time.' ( brudtland, 1984, p.45). However, Celery design has made an attempt to change the way we design things. For example, The box has been designed so that glue is not needed for assembly, meaning less chemicals and energy needed for manufacturing.

Bibliography of 13 books for essay and their relevence

Lewis, H. and Gertsakis, J. (2001) Design and Environment: a Global Guide to Designing Greener Goods. Sheffield, Greenleaf (745.2)

This book is a straightforward practical resource and guidelines for designer who want to create greener and less environmentally damaging products. This book is basically a back up of how harmful some materials and chemicals can be to the environment without anyone even knowing about it. It helps one look at pieces of designs more critically in terms of how 'green' they are.


McDonough, W. and Braugart, M. (2002) Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things. New York, North Point Press. (745.2)

This book is my main resource in which I base my essay on. Therefore it probably has the highest relevance to this essay than any other books in this bibliography. I am using all these other books to basically back up the cradle to cradle theory proposed in this book. and also to back up their other proposed design theory which is supposedly the one all designs are based on at the moment. Therefore , this book is more of a base

Papanek, V. (2nd edition 1984) Design for the Real World:Human Ecology and Social Change. London, Thames and Hudson. (745.4)

Also another really important book for this essay. Papanek is one of the first people to have written about how our method of design has been shaped by industrial revolution and how it lacked the hindsight of the effect the industry has on the environment.


Chapman, J. and Gant, N. (2007) Designers, Visionaries and Other Stories: A Collection of Sustainable Design Essays. London, Earthscan Publications Ltd. (745.2)

This book contains differen journals on design, the environment and sustainability and it is a very useful book to reference to for informed opinion on sustainability.


Dougherty, B (2008) Green Graphic Design. New York. Allworth Press



Shedroff, N (2009) Design is the Problem: The Future of Design Must be Sustainable. New York, Rosenfeld Media.

This book was mainly written about product design and its impact on the environment but I thought that a lot of the principles and observations made in this book can be applied to Graphic Design as well. the book also provides examples of unsustainable design solutions which will back up the 'design to grave theory.


Fuad-Luke, A. (2009) Design Activism: Beautiful Strangeness for a Sustainable World. London, Earthscane Publications.

Hawken.P, (2008) Natural Capitalism: Creating the Next Industrial Revolution. New York, Back Bay Books.

Berman, D.B (2008) Do Good Design: How Design Can Change our World: How Visual Communicators Can Save the World. California, Peachpit Press.

Roberts, L. (2006) An Introduction to Ethics in Graphic Design. West Sussex, AVA Publishing.

Shedroff, N (2009) Design is the problem: The Future of design mist be Sustainable. New York. Rosenfeld Media.

Fry, T (2008) Design Futuring: Sustainability, Ethics & New Practice. Basingstoke, BERG.

Stephens, S. (2009) The Big Book of Green Design. London, Harper Collins Publishers

Dougherty, B (2008) Green Graphic Design. New York. Allworth Press

Lecture 6: Globalisation and Sustainability